Why does the God of the Bible condemn homosexual acts?
Last Updated: 21.06.2025 23:43
Does He?
Him and I are good and that’s all I need.
What? It’s okay for David to be both a man after God’s own heart and a Bloody Bipolar Adulterer who even desecrated what was holy, as long as he wasn’t Bisexual, right? Lol
These were common in that culture in Athens, Corinth, Ephesus, Rome, and Crete, all places Paul went. They existed centuries after Paul.
Mt 19 is about Divorce. Jesus’ reference to Celibacy is that it is a gift from God and that not everyone can receive it.
Why is it the Legalists always run to the Law?
Ultra-thin lenses halve incident wavelength to make infrared light visible - Phys.org
Why can’t some Christians?
Sodom and Gomorrah. Two cities completely filled with Gay men, young and old. Cities who recently had gone to war, who Abraham had rescued, who Lot went back to live among, who tried to rape two angels that they mistook for men … I guess.
I am not a Jewish man. I’m am not under any part of the Law for my righteousness. To place myself under the Law for my righteous standing with God would be to put myself under the curse of the Law listed in Dt 28.
What was the worst spanking you ever got? Why did you get it, and how was it given to you?
Where?
Answer to: Why does the God of the Bible condemn homosexual acts?
Try to break free from the shackles of it and you will find yourself outside the fold Pastor.
No one knows.
No. Rape is violence, not sex. The story is about kidnapping into slavery and the abuse of strangers.
In Romans chapter 1, verses 26–27 are cherry-picked out of the context which starts in verse 18. The context is Idolatry.
Here's How Much Traders Expect Apple Stock to Move After WWDC - Investopedia
Today we have Divorce courts, protections, child custody, child and spousal support.
The truth is, the Old Testament and New Testaments say next to nothing and sexual orientation is a relatively new concept.
Scholars and translators know this. The Greek translation of Arsenokoitace is uncertain. The word was coined by Paul (probably) or a contemporary of his. Any person who says they know exactly what Paul meant is lying (seriously).
(So please, before you enforce celibacy on another, castrate yourself … or leave other people alone?)
Further Musings:
Christ bringing up Genesis is not Him being exclusionary, it is Him reminding these lecherous men that their wives are bound to their hearts.
How do you emotionally react to when others seem to feel sorry for you?
Right?
Inhospitable, loathsome, yet leave it to homophobia to twist it and miss it (the verse they use in Jude fails the test because of this).
Those women were shunned, shamed, casted out and abandoned. The man had all the power and Jesus dared to challenge that. Even His disciples were astounded.
If you embrace the fact that David “embraced” Jonathan and God was cool with it, you find that your concepts about what God “hates” get thrown out.
Homophobia is a billion dollar business for Corporate Christianity. Isn’t it?
Christ bore that, so, hard pass, thanks.
What does it mean when we dream about demons, ghosts, monsters, etc.?
Many believe Paul is writing about what he sees, temples that have male and female prostitutes engaged in ritual activities.
Men interpret Scriptures certain ways, but Jesus said we make void the Word by our tradition. Groupthink is tradition.
Since Paul is who most homophobes run to in order to support their case, I went to him first, there really isn’t much left.
If anything, Paul was writing about male prostitutes, not LGBT.
Didn’t they read Galatians? Romans? James and his “Law of Liberty.” The entire New Testament? You can even find Grace in the Old Testament, some of the Rabbis have.
Last, Leviticus. Two almost identical verses. One sex act (If translated correctly. The Hebrew words are sparse. People debate everything).
Why do you think Islam oppresses women when Christianity clearly does it more?
There were Male Shrine Prostitutes in the OT book of Kings, that practice was old in Paul’s time. Many dismiss the idea based what seem to be personal or sociological reasons, not archaeological ones.
(What do you think he would write a line or two about?)